Papers with Code 아카이브

Autonomous Vehicles

태스크의 하위 분류와 논문·코드·평가·기법·데이터셋을 탐색하세요.

하위 태스크
15
평가표
1
보존된 평가 기록
2

Autonomous vehicles is the task of making a vehicle that can guide itself without human conduction.

Many of the state-of-the-art results can be found at more general task pages such as 3D Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation.

<span style="color:grey; opacity: 0.6">( Image credit: GSNet: Joint Vehicle Pose and Shape Reconstruction with Geometrical and Scene-aware Supervision )</span>

데이터셋

출처에 같은 태스크 이름으로 연결된 데이터셋입니다. 동명 태스크가 포함될 수 있으므로, 비교할 때는 평가 결과의 조건도 확인하세요.

OpenLane

OpenLane is the first real-world and the largest scaled 3D lane dataset to date. The dataset collects valuable contents from public perception dataset Waymo Open Dataset and provides lane&closest-in-path object(CIPO) annotation for 1000 segments. In short, OpenLane owns 200K frames and over 880K carefully annotated lanes. The OpenLane Dataset is publicly released to aid the research community in making advancements in 3D perception and autonomous driving technology.

Talk2Car

The Talk2Car dataset finds itself at the intersection of various research domains, promoting the development of cross-disciplinary solutions for improving the state-of-the-art in grounding natural language into visual space. The annotations were gathered with the following aspects in mind: Free-form high quality natural language commands, that stimulate the development of solutions that can operate in the wild. A realistic task setting. Specifically, the authors consider an autonomous driving setting, where a passenger can control the actions of an Autonomous Vehicle by giving commands in natural language. The Talk2Car dataset was build on top of the nuScenes dataset to include an extensive suite of sensor modalities, i.e. semantic maps, GPS, LIDAR, RADAR and 360-degree RGB images annotated with 3D bounding boxes. Such variety of input modalities sets the object referral task on the Talk2Car dataset apart from related challenges, where additional sensor modalities are generally missing. Source: https://talk2car.github.io/ Image Source: https://github.com/talk2car/Talk2Car

KITTI Road

KITTI Road is road and lane estimation benchmark that consists of 289 training and 290 test images. It contains three different categories of road scenes: * uu - urban unmarked (98/100) * um - urban marked (95/96) * umm - urban multiple marked lanes (96/94) * urban - combination of the three above Ground truth has been generated by manual annotation of the images and is available for two different road terrain types: road - the road area, i.e, the composition of all lanes, and lane - the ego-lane, i.e., the lane the vehicle is currently driving on (only available for category "um"). Ground truth is provided for training images only. Source: http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_road.php Image Source: http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_road.php

Argoverse 2 Motion Forecasting

The Argoverse 2 Motion Forecasting Dataset is a curated collection of 250,000 scenarios for training and validation. Each scenario is 11 seconds long and contains the 2D, birds-eye-view centroid and heading of each tracked object sampled at 10 Hz. To curate this collection, we sifted through thousands of hours of driving data from our fleet of self-driving test vehicles to find the most challenging segments. We place special emphasis on kinematically and socially unusual behavior, especially when exhibited by actors relevant to the ego-vehicle’s decision-making process. Some examples of interactions captured within our dataset include: buses navigating through multi-lane intersections, vehicles yielding to pedestrians at crosswalks, and cyclists sharing dense city streets. Spanning 2,000+ km over six geographically diverse cities, Argoverse 2 covers a large geographic area. Argoverse 2 also contains a large object taxonomy with 10 non-overlapping classes that encompass a broad range of actors, both static and dynamic. In comparison to the Argoverse 1 Motion Forecasting Dataset, the scenarios in this dataset are approximately twice as long and more diverse. Together, these changes incentivize methods that perform well on extended forecast horizons, handle multiple types of dynamic objects, and ensure safety in long tail scenarios.

H3D

The H3D is a large scale full-surround 3D multi-object detection and tracking dataset. It is gathered from HDD dataset, a large scale naturalistic driving dataset collected in San Francisco Bay Area. H3D consists of following features: * Full 360 degree LiDAR dataset (dense pointcloud from Velodyne-64) * 160 crowded and highly interactive traffic scenes * 1,071,302 3D bounding box labels * 8 common classes of traffic participants (Manually annotated every 2Hz and linearly propagated for 10 Hz data) * Benchmarked on state-of-the art algorithms for 3D only detection and tracking algorithms.

A*3D

The A*3D dataset is a step forward to make autonomous driving safer for pedestrians and the public in the real world. Characteristics: * 230K human-labeled 3D object annotations in 39,179 LiDAR point cloud frames and corresponding frontal-facing RGB images. * Captured at different times (day, night) and weathers (sun, cloud, rain). Source: https://github.com/I2RDL2/ASTAR-3D Image Source: https://github.com/I2RDL2/ASTAR-3D

RAP

The Richly Annotated Pedestrian (RAP) dataset is a dataset for pedestrian attribute recognition. It contains 41,585 images collected from indoor surveillance cameras. Each image is annotated with 72 attributes, while only 51 binary attributes with the positive ratio above 1% are selected for evaluation. There are 33,268 images for the training set and 8,317 for testing. Source: Localization Guided Learning for Pedestrian Attribute Recognition Image Source: http://www.rapdataset.com/rapv1.html

DR(eye)VE

DR(eye)VE is a large dataset of driving scenes for which eye-tracking annotations are available. This dataset features more than 500,000 registered frames, matching ego-centric views (from glasses worn by drivers) and car-centric views (from roof-mounted camera), further enriched by other sensors measurements. Source: Predicting the Driver's Focus of Attention: the DR(eye)VE Project Image Source: http://imagelab.ing.unimore.it/dreyeve

JRDB

A novel egocentric dataset collected from social mobile manipulator JackRabbot. The dataset includes 64 minutes of annotated multimodal sensor data including stereo cylindrical 360 degrees RGB video at 15 fps, 3D point clouds from two Velodyne 16 Lidars, line 3D point clouds from two Sick Lidars, audio signal, RGB-D video at 30 fps, 360 degrees spherical image from a fisheye camera and encoder values from the robot's wheels. Source: JRDB: A Dataset and Benchmark of Egocentric Visual Perception for Navigation in Human Environments

InteriorNet

InteriorNet is a RGB-D for large scale interior scene understanding and mapping. The dataset contains 20M images created by pipeline: * (A) the authors collected around 1 million CAD models provided by world-leading furniture manufacturers. * (B) based on those models, around 1,100 professional designers create around 22 million interior layouts. Most of such layouts have been used in real-world decorations. * (C) For each layout, authors generate a number of configurations to represent different random lightings and simulation of scene change over time in daily life. * (D) Authors provide an interactive simulator (ViSim) to help for creating ground truth IMU, events, as well as monocular or stereo camera trajectories including hand-drawn, random walking and neural network based realistic trajectory. * (E) All supported image sequences and ground truth. Source: InteriorNet: Mega-scale Multi-sensor Photo-realistic Indoor Scenes Dataset Image Source: InteriorNet: Mega-scale Multi-sensor Photo-realistic Indoor Scenes Dataset

RadarScenes

RadarScenes is a real-world radar point cloud dataset for automotive applications. It consists of measurements and point-wise annotations from more than four hours of driving collected by four series radar sensors mounted on one test vehicle. Individual detections of dynamic objects were manually grouped to clusters and labeled afterwards. The purpose of this data set is to enable the development of novel (machine learning-based) radar perception algorithms with the focus on moving road users. Images of the recorded sequences were captured using a documentary camera.

ROAD

ROAD is designed to test an autonomous vehicle's ability to detect road events, defined as triplets composed by an active agent, the action(s) it performs and the corresponding scene locations. ROAD comprises videos originally from the Oxford RobotCar Dataset, annotated with bounding boxes showing the location in the image plane of each road event.

Drive&Act

The Drive&Act dataset is a state of the art multi modal benchmark for driver behavior recognition. The dataset includes 3D skeletons in addition to frame-wise hierarchical labels of 9.6 Million frames captured by 6 different views and 3 modalities (RGB, IR and depth). It offers following key features: * 12h of video data in 29 long sequences * Calibrated multi view camera system with 5 views * Multi modal videos: NIR, Depth and Color data * Markerless motion capture: 3D Body Pose and Head Pose * Model of the static interior of the car * 83 manually annotated hierarchical activity labels: * Level 1: Long running tasks (12) * Level 2: Semantic actions (34) * Level 3: Object Interaction tripplets [action|object|location] (6|17|14) Source: Drive&Act: A Multi-Modal Dataset for Fine-Grained Driver Behavior Recognition in Autonomous Vehicles

FlickrLogos-32

Object detection benchmark for logo detection. Images are natural scenes. Each image contains multiple objects, and each image has a total of 1 logo. Logo detection & classification labels are provided.

BDD-A

Dataset Statistics: The statistics of our dataset are summarized and compared with the largest existing dataset (DR(eye)VE) [1] in Table 1. Our dataset was collected using videos selected from a publicly available, large-scale, crowd-sourced driving video dataset, BDD100k [30, 31]. BDD100K contains human-demonstrated dashboard videos and time-stamped sensor measurements collected during urban driving in various weather and lighting conditions. To efficiently collect attention data for critical driving situations, we specifically selected video clips that both included braking events and took place in busy areas (see supplementary materials for technical details). We then trimmed videos to include 6.5 seconds prior to and 3.5 seconds after each braking event. It turned out that other driving actions, e.g., turning, lane switching and accelerating, were also included. 1,232 videos (=3.5 hours) in total were collected following these procedures. Some example images from our dataset are shown in Fig. 6. Our selected videos contain a large number of different road users. We detected the objects in our videos using YOLO [22].On average, each video frame contained 4.4 cars and 0.3 pedestrians, multiple times more than the DR(eye)VE dataset (Table 1). Data Collection Procedure: For our eye-tracking experiment, we recruited 45 participants who each had more than one year of driving experience. The participants watched the selected driving videos in the lab while performing a driving instructor task: participants were asked to imagine that they were driving instructors sitting in the copilot seat and needed to press the space key whenever they felt it necessary to correct or warn the student driver of potential dangers. Their eye movements during the task were recorded at 1000 Hz with an EyeLink 1000 desktop-mounted infrared eye tracker, used in conjunction with the Eyelink Toolbox scripts [7] for MATLAB. Each participant completed the task for 200 driving videos. Each driving video was viewed by at least 4 participants. The gaze patterns made by these independent participants were aggregated and smoothed to make an attention map for each frame of the stimulus video (see Fig. 6 and supplementary materials for technical details). Psychological studies [19, 11] have shown that when humans look through multiple visual cues that simultaneously demand attention, the order in which humans look at those cues is highly subjective. Therefore, by aggregating gazes of independent observers, we could record multiple important visual cues in one frame. In addition, it has been shown that human drivers look at buildings, trees, flowerbeds, and other unimportant objects non-negligibly frequently [1]. Presumably, these eye movements should be regarded as noise for driving-related machine learning purposes. By averaging the eye movements of independent observers, we were able to effectively wash out those sources of noise (see Fig. 2B). Comparison with In-Car Attention Data: We collected in-lab driver attention data using videos from the DR(eye)VE dataset. This allowed us to compare in-lab and in-car attention maps of each video. The DR(eye)VE videos we used were 200 randomly selected 10-second video clips, half of them containing braking events and half without braking events. We tested how well in-car and in-lab attention maps highlighted driving-relevant objects. We used YOLO [22] to detect the objects in the videos of our dataset. We identified three object categories that are important for driving and that had sufficient instances in the videos (car, pedestrian and cyclist). We calculated the proportion of attended objects out of total detected instances for each category for both in-lab and in-car attention maps (see supplementary materials for technical details). The results showed that in-car attention maps highlighted significantly less driving-relevant objects than in-lab attention maps (see Fig. 2A). The difference in the number of attended objects between the in-car and in-lab attention maps can be due to the fact that eye movements collected from a single driver do not completely indicate all the objects that demand attention in the particular driving situation. One individual’s eye movements are only an approximation of their attention [23], and humans can also track objects with covert attention without looking at them [6]. The difference in the number of attended objects may also reflect the difference between first-person driver attention and third-person driver attention. It may be that the human observers in our in-lab eye-tracking experiment also looked at objects that were not relevant for driving. We ran a human evaluation experiment to address this concern. Human Evaluation: To verify that our in-lab driver attention maps highlight regions that should indeed demand drivers’ attention, we conducted an online study to let humans compare in-lab and in-car driver attention maps. In each trial of the online study, participants watched one driving video clip three times: the first time with no edit, and then two more times in random order with overlaid in-lab and in-car attention maps, respectively. The participant was then asked to choose which heatmap-coded video was more similar to where a good driver would look. In total, we collected 736 trials from 32 online participants. We found that our in-lab attention maps were more often preferred by the participants than the in-car attention maps (71% versus 29% of all trials, statistically significant as p = 1×10−29, see Table 2). Although this result cannot suggest that in-lab driver attention maps are superior to in-car attention maps in general, it does show that the driver attention maps collected with our protocol represent where a good driver should look from a third-person perspective. In addition, we will show in the Experiments section that in-lab attention data collected using our protocol can be used to train a model to effectively predict actual, in-car driver attention. This result proves that our dataset can also serve as a substitute for in-car driver attention data, especially in crucial situations where in-car data collection is not practical. To summarize, compared with driver attention data collected in-car, our dataset has three clear advantages: multi-focus, little driving-irrelevant noise, and efficiently tailored to crucial driving situations.

CARRADA

CARRADA is a dataset of synchronized camera and radar recordings with range-angle-Doppler annotations. Source: CARRADA Dataset: Camera and Automotive Radar with Range-Angle-Doppler Annotations Image Source: https://github.com/valeoai/carrada_dataset

Argoverse-HD

Argoverse-HD is a dataset built for streaming object detection, which encompasses real-time object detection, video object detection, tracking, and short-term forecasting. It contains the video data from Argoverse 1.1 with our own MS COCO-style bounding box annotations with track IDs. The annotations are backward-compatible with COCO as one can directly evaluate COCO pre-trained models on this dataset to estimate the efficiency or the cross-dataset generalization capability of the models. The dataset contains high-quality and temporally-dense annotations for high-resolution videos (1920 x 1200 @ 30 FPS). Overall, there are 70,000 image frames and 1.3 million bounding boxes. Argoverse-HD is the dataset used in the Streaming Perception Challenge, which includes two tracks: - Detection-only (real-time object detection). In this track, the participants will develop single-frame object detectors as they would for COCO and LVIS challenges. The crucial distinction is that the evaluation will score latency through streaming accuracy. - Full-stack. In this track, the method is unrestricted. However, most likely tracking and forecasting will be used to compensate for the latency of the detectors. By default, all submissions measure their latency on a V100 GPU with the official toolkit.

CurveLanes

CurveLanes is a new benchmark lane detection dataset with 150K lanes images for difficult scenarios such as curves and multi-lanes in traffic lane detection. It is collected in real urban and highway scenarios in multiple cities in China. It is the largest lane detection dataset so far and establishes a more challenging benchmark for the community. We separate the whole dataset 150K into three parts: train:100K, val: 20K and testing: 30K. The resolution of most images in this dataset is 2650×1440. For each image, we manually annotate all lanes in image with natural cubic splines. All images are carefully selected so that most of them image contains at least one curve lane. More difficult scenarios such as S-curves, Y-lanes, night and multi-lanes (the number of lane lines is more than 4) can be found in this dataset.

KAIST Urban

This data set provides Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and stereo image with various position sensors targeting a highly complex urban environment. The presented data set captures features in urban environments (e.g. metropolis areas, complex buildings and residential areas). The data of 2D and 3D LiDAR are provided, which are typical types of LiDAR sensors. Raw sensor data for vehicle navigation is presented in a file format. For convenience, development tools are provided in the Robot Operating System (ROS) environment. Source: https://sites.google.com/view/complex-urban-dataset Image Source: https://irap.kaist.ac.kr/dataset/

Endomapper

The Endomapper dataset is the first collection of complete endoscopy sequences acquired during regular medical practice, including slow and careful screening explorations, making secondary use of medical data. Its original purpose is to facilitate the development and evaluation of VSLAM (Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) methods in real endoscopy data. The first release of the dataset is composed of 50 sequences with a total of more than 13 hours of video. It is also the first endoscopic dataset that includes both the computed geometric and photometric endoscope calibration as well as the original calibration videos. Meta-data and annotations associated to the dataset varies from anatomical landmark and description of the procedure labeling, tools segmentation masks, COLMAP 3D reconstructions, simulated sequences with groundtruth and meta-data related to special cases, such as sequences from the same patient. This information will improve the research in endoscopic VSLAM, as well as other research lines, and create new research lines.

Wild-Places

Many existing datasets for lidar place recognition are solely representative of structured urban environments, and have recently been saturated in performance by deep learning based approaches. Natural and unstructured environments present many additional challenges for the tasks of long-term localisation but these environments are not represented in currently available datasets. To address this we introduce Wild-Places, a challenging large-scale dataset for lidar place recognition in unstructured, natural environments. Wild-Places contains eight lidar sequences collected with a handheld sensor payload over the course of fourteen months, containing a total of 63K undistorted lidar submaps along with accurate 6DoF ground truth. This dataset contains multiple revisits both within and between sequences, allowing for both intra-sequence (i.e., loop closure detection) and inter-sequence (i.e., re-localisation) tasks. We also benchmark several state-of-the-art approaches to demonstrate the challenges that this dataset introduces, particularly the case of long-term place recognition due to natural environments changing over time. Our dataset and code is available at https://csiro-robotics.github.io/Wild-Places

ViViD++

A dataset capturing diverse visual data formats that target varying luminance conditions, and was recorded from alternative vision sensors, by handheld or mounted on a car, repeatedly in the same space but in different conditions.

CURE-TSR

Includes more than two million traffic sign images that are based on real-world and simulator data. Source: CURE-TSR: Challenging Unreal and Real Environments for Traffic Sign Recognition

Expi

Extreme Pose Interaction (ExPI) Dataset is a new person interaction dataset of Lindy Hop dancing actions. In Lindy Hop, the two dancers are called leader and follower. The authors recorded two couples of dancers in a multi-camera setup equipped also with a motion-capture system. 16 different actions are performed in ExPI dataset, some by the two couples of dancers, some by only one of the couples. Each action was repeated five times to account for variability. More precisely, for each recorded sequence, ExPI provides: (i) Multi-view videos at 25FPS from all the cameras in the recording setup; (ii) Mocap data (3D position of 18 joints for each person) at 25FPS synchronized with the videos.; (iii) camera calibration information; and (iv) 3D shapes as textured meshes for each frame. Overall, the dataset contains 115 sequences with 30k visual frames for each viewpoint and 60k 3D instances annotated

4Seasons

4Seasons is adataset covering seasonal and challenging perceptual conditions for autonomous driving. Source: 4Seasons: A Cross-Season Dataset for Multi-Weather SLAM in Autonomous Driving Image Source: Wenzel et al

TITAN

TITAN consists of 700 labeled video-clips (with odometry) captured from a moving vehicle on highly interactive urban traffic scenes in Tokyo. The dataset includes 50 labels including vehicle states and actions, pedestrian age groups, and targeted pedestrian action attributes that are organized hierarchically corresponding to atomic, simple/complex-contextual, transportive, and communicative actions. Source: TITAN: Future Forecast using Action Priors

CADP

A novel dataset for traffic accidents analysis. Source: CADP: A Novel Dataset for CCTV Traffic Camera based Accident Analysis

KITTI-Depth

The KITTI-Depth dataset includes depth maps from projected LiDAR point clouds that were matched against the depth estimation from the stereo cameras. The depth images are highly sparse with only 5% of the pixels available and the rest is missing. The dataset has 86k training images, 7k validation images, and 1k test set images on the benchmark server with no access to the ground truth. Source: Confidence Propagation through CNNs for Guided Sparse Depth Regression Image Source: http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_depth.php?benchmark=depth_prediction

SinD

The SIND dataset is based on 4K video captured by drones, providing information including traffic participant trajectories, traffic light status, and high-definition maps

출처: Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0. 아카이브 자료와 새로 수집한 논문은 별도로 관리합니다.