Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables for Counterfactual Regression
원문 초록
In causal inference, encouragement designs (EDs) are widely used to analyze causal effects, when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are impractical or compliance to treatment cannot be perfectly enforced. Unlike RCTs, which directly allocate treatments, EDs randomly assign encouragement policies that positively motivate individuals to engage in a specific treatment. These random encouragements act as instrumental variables (IVs), facilitating the identification of causal effects through leveraging exogenous perturbations in discrete treatment scenarios. However, real-world applications of encouragement designs often face challenges such as incomplete randomization, limited experimental data, and significantly fewer encouragements compared to treatments, hindering precise causal effect estimation. To address this, this paper introduces novel theories and algorithms for identifying the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) using variations in encouragement. Further, by leveraging both observational and encouragement data, we propose a generalized IV estimator, named Encouragement-based Counterfactual Regression (EnCounteR), to effectively estimate the causal effects. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of EnCounteR over existing methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence
Causal Cartographer: From Mapping to Reasoning Over Counterfactual Worlds
Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects
Causal Inference for Experiments with Latent Outcomes: Key Results and Their Implications for Design and Analysis
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.