Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
원문 초록
Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this paper, we formally discover the recoverability of $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ under selection bias with experimental data. By explicitly constructing counterfactual worlds via Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we analyze how selection mechanisms in the observational world propagate to the counterfactual domain. We derive a complete set of graphical and theoretical criteria to determine that the experimental distribution remain unaffected by selection bias. Furthermore, we propose principled methods for leveraging partially unbiased observational data to recover $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ from biased experimental datasets. Simulation studies replicating realistic research scenarios demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, offering concrete guidance for mitigating selection bias in applied causal inference.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
Causal Cartographer: From Mapping to Reasoning Over Counterfactual Worlds
Quantum Neural Networks for Propensity Score Estimation and Survival Analysis in Observational Biomedical Studies
Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects
A Synthetic Business Cycle Approach to Counterfactual Analysis with Nonstationary Macroeconomic Data
Estimating Online Influence Needs Causal Modeling! Counterfactual Analysis of Social Media Engagement
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.