Causal Inference for Experiments with Latent Outcomes: Key Results and Their Implications for Design and Analysis
원문 초록
How should researchers analyze randomized experiments in which the main outcome is measured in multiple ways but each measure contains some degree of error? We describe modeling approaches that enable researchers to identify causal parameters of interest, suggest ways that experimental designs can be augmented so as to make linear latent variable models more credible, and discuss empirical tests of key modeling assumptions. We show that when experimental researchers invest appropriately in multiple outcome measures, an optimally weighted index of the outcome measures enables researchers to obtain efficient and interpretable estimates of causal parameters by applying standard regression methods, and that weights may be obtained using instrumental variables regression. Maximum likelihood and generalized method of moments estimators can be used to obtain estimates and standard errors in a single step. An empirical application illustrates the gains in precision and robustness that multiple outcome measures can provide.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Debiased Ill-Posed Regression
Behind the Noise: Conformal Quantile Regression Reveals Emergent Representations
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Vector Contrastive Learning For Pixel-Wise Pretraining In Medical Vision
GRASP: Grouped Regression with Adaptive Shrinkage Priors
Learning Causally Predictable Outcomes from Psychiatric Longitudinal Data
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.