Papers with Code 아카이브

multimodal generation

태스크의 하위 분류와 논문·코드·평가·기법·데이터셋을 탐색하세요.

하위 태스크
0
평가표
1
보존된 평가 기록
1

Multimodal generation refers to the process of generating outputs that incorporate multiple modalities, such as images, text, and sound. This can be done using deep learning models that are trained on data that includes multiple modalities, allowing the models to generate output that is informed by more than one type of data.

For example, a multimodal generation model could be trained to generate captions for images that incorporate both text and visual information. The model could learn to identify objects in the image and generate descriptions of them in natural language, while also taking into account contextual information and the relationships between the objects in the image.

Multimodal generation can also be used in other applications, such as generating realistic images from textual descriptions or generating audio descriptions of video content. By combining multiple modalities in this way, multimodal generation models can produce more accurate and comprehensive output, making them useful for a wide range of applications.

데이터셋

출처에 같은 태스크 이름으로 연결된 데이터셋입니다. 동명 태스크가 포함될 수 있으므로, 비교할 때는 평가 결과의 조건도 확인하세요.

Multi-Modal CelebA-HQ

Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ is a large-scale face image dataset that has 30,000 high-resolution face images selected from the CelebA dataset by following CelebA-HQ. Each image has high-quality segmentation mask, sketch, descriptive text, and image with transparent background. Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ can be used to train and evaluate algorithms of text-to-image-generation, text-guided image manipulation, sketch-to-image generation, and GANs for face generation and editing. Source: Multi-Modal CelebA-HQ Dataset Image Source: Xia et al

MMNeedle

We introduce the MultiModal Needle-in-a-haystack (MMNeedle) benchmark, specifically designed to assess the long-context capabilities of MLLMs. Besides multi-image input, we employ image stitching to further increase the input context length, and develop a protocol to automatically generate labels for sub-image level retrieval. Essentially, MMNeedle evaluates MLLMs by stress-testing their capability to locate a target sub-image (needle) within a set of images (haystack) based on textual instructions and descriptions of image contents. This setup necessitates an advanced understanding of extensive visual contexts and effective information retrieval within long-context image inputs.

Alex-20

Alex-20: contains ~1.3M general inorganic materials curated from the Alexandria database, with energy above the convex hull less than 0.1 eV/atom and no more than 20 atoms in unit cell.

MedTrinity-25M

Click to add a brief description of the dataset (Markdown and LaTeX enabled). Provide: * a high-level explanation of the dataset characteristics * explain motivations and summary of its content * potential use cases of the dataset

REBUS

Recent advances in large language models have led to the development of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), which take both image data and text as an input. Virtually all of these models have been announced within the past year, leading to a significant need for benchmarks evaluating the abilities of these models to reason truthfully and accurately on a diverse set of tasks. When Google announced Gemini (Gemini Team et al., 2023), they showcased its ability to solve rebuses—wordplay puzzles which involve creatively adding and subtracting letters from words derived from text and images. The diversity of rebuses allows for a broad evaluation of multimodal reasoning capabilities, including image recognition, multi- step reasoning, and understanding the human creator’s intent. We present REBUS: a collection of 333 hand-crafted rebuses spanning 13 diverse cate- gories, including hand-drawn and digital images created by nine contributors. Samples are presented in Table 1. Notably, GPT-4V, the most powerful model we evaluated, answered only 24% of puzzles correctly, highlighting the poor capabilities of MLLMs in new and unex- pected domains to which human reasoning generalizes with comparative ease. Open-source models perform even worse, with a median accuracy below 1%. We notice that models often give faithless explanations, fail to change their minds after an initial approach doesn’t work, and remain highly uncalibrated on their own abilities.

출처: Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0. 아카이브 자료와 새로 수집한 논문은 별도로 관리합니다.