Papers with Code 아카이브

Biomedical Information Retrieval

태스크의 하위 분류와 논문·코드·평가·기법·데이터셋을 탐색하세요.

하위 태스크
2
평가표
3
보존된 평가 기록
19

데이터셋

출처에 같은 태스크 이름으로 연결된 데이터셋입니다. 동명 태스크가 포함될 수 있으므로, 비교할 때는 평가 결과의 조건도 확인하세요.

BEIR

BEIR (Benchmarking IR) is a heterogeneous benchmark containing different information retrieval (IR) tasks. Through BEIR, it is possible to systematically study the zero-shot generalization capabilities of multiple neural retrieval approaches. The benchmark contains a total of 9 information retrieval tasks (Fact Checking, Citation Prediction, Duplicate Question Retrieval, Argument Retrieval, News Retrieval, Question Answering, Tweet Retrieval, Biomedical IR, Entity Retrieval) from 19 different datasets: * MS MARCO * TREC-COVID * NFCorpus * BioASQ * Natural Questions * HotpotQA * FiQA-2018 * Signal-1M * TREC-News * ArguAna * Touche 2020 * CQADupStack * Quora Question Pairs * DBPedia * SciDocs * FEVER * Climate-FEVER * SciFact * Robust04

TripClick

TripClick is a large-scale dataset of click logs in the health domain, obtained from user interactions of the Trip Database health web search engine. Provide: * Approximately 5.2 million user interactions * IR evaluation benchmark * Trainin data for deep learning IR models

NFCorpus

NFCorpus is a full-text English retrieval data set for Medical Information Retrieval. It contains a total of 3,244 natural language queries (written in non-technical English, harvested from the NutritionFacts.org site) with 169,756 automatically extracted relevance judgments for 9,964 medical documents (written in a complex terminology-heavy language), mostly from PubMed.

MTHS

the MTHS dataset contains 30Hz PPG signals obtained from 62 patients, including 35 men and 27 women. The ground truth data includes heart rate and oxygen saturation levels sampled at 1Hz. The HR and SPo2 measurement is obtained using a pulse oximeter (M70). An iPhone 5s was used to obtain the ppg recordings at 30 fps.

SuMe

Can language models read biomedical texts and explain the biomedical mechanisms discussed? In this work we introduce a biomedical mechanism summarization task. Biomedical studies often investigate the mechanisms behind how one entity (e.g., a protein or a chemical) affects another in a biological context. The abstracts of these publications often include a focused set of sentences that present relevant supporting statements regarding such relationships, associated experimental evidence, and a concluding sentence that summarizes the mechanism underlying the relationship. We leverage this structure and create a summarization task, where the input is a collection of sentences and the main entities in an abstract, and the output includes the relationship and a sentence that summarizes the mechanism. Using a small amount of manually labeled mechanism sentences, we train a mechanism sentence classifier to filter a large biomedical abstract collection and create a summarization dataset with 22k instances. We also introduce conclusion sentence generation as a pretraining task with 611k instances. We benchmark the performance of large bio-domain language models. We find that while the pretraining task help improves performance, the best model produces acceptable mechanism outputs in only 32% of the instances, which shows the task presents significant challenges in biomedical language understanding and summarization.

출처: Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0. 아카이브 자료와 새로 수집한 논문은 별도로 관리합니다.