태스크의 하위 분류와 논문·코드·평가·기법·데이터셋을 탐색하세요.
Since evidence is clearly supporting the corresponding claims in an article, claims and evidence are mutually reinforcing each other in the context. Therefore, we hypothesize the claim extraction task and the evidence extraction task may benefit each other. By combining these two subtasks, we define the second integrated task as: given a specific topic and relevant articles, extract the claim-evidence pairs (CEPs) from the articles.
출처에 같은 태스크 이름으로 연결된 데이터셋입니다. 동명 태스크가 포함될 수 있으므로, 비교할 때는 평가 결과의 조건도 확인하세요.
We introduce a large and comprehensive dataset to facilitate the study of several essential AM tasks in the debating system. In our work, we first review the existing subtasks (claim extraction, stance classification, evidence extraction), and then propose two integrated argument mining tasks: claim extraction with stance classification (CESC) and claim-evidence pair extraction (CEPE).
출처: Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0. 아카이브 자료와 새로 수집한 논문은 별도로 관리합니다.