Papers with Code 아카이브

Information Extraction

태스크의 하위 분류와 논문·코드·평가·기법·데이터셋을 탐색하세요.

하위 태스크
16
평가표
1
보존된 평가 기록
1

Information extraction is the task of automatically extracting structured information from unstructured and / or semi-structured machine-readable documents and other electronically represented sources (Source: Wikipedia).

데이터셋

출처에 같은 태스크 이름으로 연결된 데이터셋입니다. 동명 태스크가 포함될 수 있으므로, 비교할 때는 평가 결과의 조건도 확인하세요.

MNIST

The MNIST database (Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology database) is a large collection of handwritten digits. It has a training set of 60,000 examples, and a test set of 10,000 examples. It is a subset of a larger NIST Special Database 3 (digits written by employees of the United States Census Bureau) and Special Database 1 (digits written by high school students) which contain monochrome images of handwritten digits. The digits have been size-normalized and centered in a fixed-size image. The original black and white (bilevel) images from NIST were size normalized to fit in a 20x20 pixel box while preserving their aspect ratio. The resulting images contain grey levels as a result of the anti-aliasing technique used by the normalization algorithm. the images were centered in a 28x28 image by computing the center of mass of the pixels, and translating the image so as to position this point at the center of the 28x28 field. Source: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/ Image Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MNIST_database#/media/File:MnistExamples.png

CoNLL 2003

CoNLL-2003 is a named entity recognition dataset released as a part of CoNLL-2003 shared task: language-independent named entity recognition. The data consists of eight files covering two languages: English and German. For each of the languages there is a training file, a development file, a test file and a large file with unannotated data. The English data was taken from the Reuters Corpus. This corpus consists of Reuters news stories between August 1996 and August 1997. For the training and development set, ten days worth of data were taken from the files representing the end of August 1996. For the test set, the texts were from December 1996. The preprocessed raw data covers the month of September 1996. The text for the German data was taken from the ECI Multilingual Text Corpus. This corpus consists of texts in many languages. The portion of data that was used for this task, was extracted from the German newspaper Frankfurter Rundshau. All three of the training, development and test sets were taken from articles written in one week at the end of August 1992. The raw data were taken from the months of September to December 1992. | English data | Articles | Sentences | Tokens | LOC | MISC | ORG | PER | |-------------------|----------|-----------|---------|------|------|------|------| | Training set | 946 | 14,987 | 203,621 | 7140 | 3438 | 6321 | 6600 | | Development set | 216 | 3,466 | 51,362 | 1837 | 922 | 1341 | 1842 | | Test set | 231 | 3,684 | 46,435 | 1668 | 702 | 1661 | 1617 | Number of articles, sentences, tokens and entities (locations, miscellaneous, organizations, and persons) in English data files. | German data | Articles | Sentences | Tokens | LOC | MISC | ORG | PER | |-------------------|----------|-----------|---------|------|------|------|------| | Training set | 553 | 12,705 | 206,931 | 4363 | 2288 | 2427 | 2773 | | Development set | 201 | 3,068 | 51,444 | 1181 | 1010 | 1241 | 1401 | | Test set | 155 | 3,160 | 51,943 | 1035 | 670 | 773 | 1195 | Number of articles, sentences, tokens and entities (locations, miscellaneous, organizations, and persons) in German data files.

New York Times Annotated Corpus

The New York Times Annotated Corpus contains over 1.8 million articles written and published by the New York Times between January 1, 1987 and June 19, 2007 with article metadata provided by the New York Times Newsroom, the New York Times Indexing Service and the online production staff at nytimes.com. The corpus includes: - Over 1.8 million articles (excluding wire services articles that appeared during the covered period). - Over 650,000 article summaries written by library scientists. - Over 1,500,000 articles manually tagged by library scientists with tags drawn from a normalized indexing vocabulary of people, organizations, locations and topic descriptors. - Over 275,000 algorithmically-tagged articles that have been hand verified by the online production staff at nytimes.com. As part of the New York Times' indexing procedures, most articles are manually summarized and tagged by a staff of library scientists. This collection contains over 650,000 article-summary pairs which may prove to be useful in the development and evaluation of algorithms for automated document summarization. Also, over 1.5 million documents have at least one tag. Articles are tagged for persons, places, organizations, titles and topics using a controlled vocabulary that is applied consistently across articles. For instance if one article mentions "Bill Clinton" and another refers to "President William Jefferson Clinton", both articles will be tagged with "CLINTON, BILL". Source: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2008T19

CoNLL

The CoNLL dataset is a widely used resource in the field of natural language processing (NLP). The term “CoNLL” stands for Conference on Natural Language Learning. It originates from a series of shared tasks organized at the Conferences of Natural Language Learning.

DocRED

DocRED (Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset) is a relation extraction dataset constructed from Wikipedia and Wikidata. Each document in the dataset is human-annotated with named entity mentions, coreference information, intra- and inter-sentence relations, and supporting evidence. DocRED requires reading multiple sentences in a document to extract entities and infer their relations by synthesizing all information of the document. Along with the human-annotated data, the dataset provides large-scale distantly supervised data. DocRED contains 132,375 entities and 56,354 relational facts annotated on 5,053 Wikipedia documents. In addition to the human-annotated data, the dataset provides large-scale distantly supervised data over 101,873 documents. Source: DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset Image Source: DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset

WebNLG

The WebNLG corpus comprises of sets of triplets describing facts (entities and relations between them) and the corresponding facts in form of natural language text. The corpus contains sets with up to 7 triplets each along with one or more reference texts for each set. The test set is split into two parts: seen, containing inputs created for entities and relations belonging to DBpedia categories that were seen in the training data, and unseen, containing inputs extracted for entities and relations belonging to 5 unseen categories. Initially, the dataset was used for the WebNLG natural language generation challenge which consists of mapping the sets of triplets to text, including referring expression generation, aggregation, lexicalization, surface realization, and sentence segmentation. The corpus is also used for a reverse task of triplets extraction. Versioning history of the dataset can be found here. Source: Step-by-Step: Separating Planning from Realization in Neural Data-to-Text Generation Image Source: https://paperswithcode.com/paper/creating-training-corpora-for-nlg-micro/ It's also available here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/web_nlg Note: "The v3 release (release_v3.0_en, release_v3.0_ru) for the WebNLG2020 challenge also supports a semantic parsing task."

SciERC

SciERC dataset is a collection of 500 scientific abstract annotated with scientific entities, their relations, and coreference clusters. The abstracts are taken from 12 AI conference/workshop proceedings in four AI communities, from the Semantic Scholar Corpus. SciERC extends previous datasets in scientific articles SemEval 2017 Task 10 and SemEval 2018 Task 7 by extending entity types, relation types, relation coverage, and adding cross-sentence relations using coreference links. Source: http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/sciIE/ Image Source: http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/sciIE/

GENIA

The GENIA corpus is the primary collection of biomedical literature compiled and annotated within the scope of the GENIA project. The corpus was created to support the development and evaluation of information extraction and text mining systems for the domain of molecular biology. The corpus contains 1,999 Medline abstracts, selected using a PubMed query for the three MeSH terms “human”, “blood cells”, and “transcription factors”. The corpus has been annotated with various levels of linguistic and semantic information. The primary categories of annotation in the GENIA corpus and the corresponding subcorpora are: * Part-of-Speech annotation * Constituency (phrase structure) syntactic annotation * Term annotation * Event annotation * Relation annotation * Coreference annotation Source: http://www.geniaproject.org/genia-corpus Image Source: http://www.geniaproject.org/genia-corpus

RadGraph

RadGraph is a dataset of entities and relations in radiology reports based on our novel information extraction schema, consisting of 600 reports with 30K radiologist annotations and 221K reports with 10.5M automatically generated annotations. We release a development dataset, which contains board-certified radiologist annotations for 500 radiology reports from the MIMIC-CXR dataset (14,579 entities and 10,889 relations), and a test dataset, which contains two independent sets of board-certified radiologist annotations for 100 radiology reports split equally across the MIMIC-CXR and CheXpert datasets. We also release an inference dataset, which contains automatically generated annotations for 220,763 MIMIC-CXR reports (around 6 million entities and 4 million relations) and 500 CheXpert reports (13,783 entities and 9,908 relations) with mappings to associated chest radiographs.

Few-NERD

Few-NERD is a large-scale, fine-grained manually annotated named entity recognition dataset, which contains 8 coarse-grained types, 66 fine-grained types, 188,200 sentences, 491,711 entities, and 4,601,223 tokens. Three benchmark tasks are built, one is supervised (Few-NERD (SUP)) and the other two are few-shot (Few-NERD (INTRA) and Few-NERD (INTER)).

ACE 2005

ACE 2005 Multilingual Training Corpus contains the complete set of English, Arabic and Chinese training data for the 2005 Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) technology evaluation. The corpus consists of data of various types annotated for entities, relations and events by the Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) with support from the ACE Program and additional assistance from LDC. Source: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2006T06 Image Source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.06031.pdf

EBM-NLP

EBM-NLP annotates PICO (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes) spans in clinical trial abstracts. The corresponding PICO Extraction task aims to identify the spans in clinical trial abstracts that describe the respective PICO elements.

SciREX

SCIREX is a document level IE dataset that encompasses multiple IE tasks, including salient entity identification and document level N-ary relation identification from scientific articles. The dataset is annotated by integrating automatic and human annotations, leveraging existing scientific knowledge resources. Source: SCIREX: A Challenge Dataset for Document-Level Information Extraction

WikiEvents

WikiEvents is a document-level event extraction benchmark dataset which includes complete event and coreference annotation.

MSRA CN NER

Simplified Chinese dataset for NER in The Third International Chinese Language Processing Bakeoff (2006), provided by Microsoft Research Asia (MSRA).

ChFinAnn

Ten years (2008-2018) ChFinAnn documents and human-summarized event knowledge bases to conduct the DS-based event labeling. Five event types included: Equity Freeze (EF), Equity Repurchase (ER), Equity Underweight (EU), Equity Overweight (EO) and Equity Pledge (EP), which belong to major events required to be disclosed by the regulator and may have a huge impact on the company value. To ensure the labeling quality, the authors set constraints for matched document-record pairs. There are 32, 040 documents in total, and this number is ten times larger than 2, 976 of DCFEE and about 53 times larger than 599 of ACE 2005. These documents are divided into train, development, and test set with the proportion of 8 : 1 : 1 based on the time order. This DS-generated data are pretty good, achieving high precision and acceptable recall. In later experiments, the authors directly employ the automatically generated test set for evaluation due to its much broad coverage.

CoNLL04

The CoNLL04 dataset is a benchmark dataset used for relation extraction tasks. It contains 1,437 sentences, each of which has at least one relation. The sentences are annotated with information about entities and their corresponding relation types.

DWIE

The 'Deutsche Welle corpus for Information Extraction' (DWIE) is a multi-task dataset that combines four main Information Extraction (IE) annotation sub-tasks: (i) Named Entity Recognition (NER), (ii) Coreference Resolution, (iii) Relation Extraction (RE), and (iv) Entity Linking. DWIE is conceived as an entity-centric dataset that describes interactions and properties of conceptual entities on the level of the complete document. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12626

TempEval-3

Within the SemEval-2013 evaluation exercise, the TempEval-3 shared task aims to advance research on temporal information processing. It follows on from TempEval-1 and -2, with: a three-part structure covering temporal expression, event, and temporal relation extraction; a larger dataset; and new single measures to rank systems – in each task and in general. We present TempEval-3 Silver data, with 666K words, and TempEval-3 Platinum, an evaluation set with 6K words. Documents are annotation with EVENT and TIMEX3 spans and also TLINKs, following the TimeML standard.

M2E2

Aims to extract events and their arguments from multimedia documents. Develops the first benchmark and collect a dataset of 245 multimedia news articles with extensively annotated events and arguments. Source: Cross-media Structured Common Space for Multimedia Event Extraction

Adverse Drug Events (ADE) Corpus

Development of a benchmark corpus to support the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. A significant amount of information about drug-related safety issues such as adverse effects are published in medical case reports that can only be explored by human readers due to their unstructured nature. The work presented here aims at generating a systematically annotated corpus that can support the development and validation of methods for the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. The documents are systematically double annotated in various rounds to ensure consistent annotations. The annotated documents are finally harmonized to generate representative consensus annotations. In order to demonstrate an example use case scenario, the corpus was employed to train and validate models for the classification of informative against the non-informative sentences. A Maximum Entropy classifier trained with simple features and evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation resulted in the F₁ score of 0.70 indicating a potential useful application of the corpus.

DEFT Corpus

A SemEval shared task in which participants must extract definitions from free text using a term-definition pair corpus that reflects the complex reality of definitions in natural language. Source: SemEval-2020 Task 6: Definition extraction from free text with the DEFT corpus

MAVE

The dataset contains 3 million attribute-value annotations across 1257 unique categories created from 2.2 million cleaned Amazon product profiles. It is a large, multi-sourced, diverse dataset for product attribute extraction study.

AE-110k

The dataset contains product information from AliExpress Sports & Entertainment category. Each attribute value in "Item Specific" is matched against the product title using exact string match to generate positive triples <title, attribute, value>. Negative triples <title, attribute, NULL> are randomly generated. Each triple is stored in a line and separated by \u0001.

Broad Twitter Corpus

This paper introduces the Broad Twitter Corpus (BTC), which is not only significantly bigger, but sampled across different regions, temporal periods, and types of Twitter users. The gold-standard named entity annotations are made by a combination of NLP experts and crowd workers, which enables us to harness crowd recall while maintaining high quality. We also measure the entity drift observed in our dataset (i.e. how entity representation varies over time), and compare to newswire.

CDR

The BioCreative V CDR task corpus is manually annotated for chemicals, diseases and chemical-induced disease (CID) relations. It contains the titles and abstracts of 1500 PubMed articles and is split into equally sized train, validation and test sets. It is common to first tune a model on the validation set and then train on the combination of the train and validation sets before evaluating on the test set. It is also common to filter negative relations with disease entities that are hypernyms of a corresponding true relations disease entity within the same abstract (see Appendix C of this paper for details).

TekGen

The Dataset is part of the KELM corpus This is the Wikipedia text--Wikidata KG aligned corpus used to train the data-to-text generation model. Please note that this is a corpus generated with distant supervision and should not be used as gold standard for evaluation. It consists of 3 files: https://storage.googleapis.com/gresearch/kelm-corpus/updated-2021/quadruples-train.tsv https://storage.googleapis.com/gresearch/kelm-corpus/updated-2021/quadruples-validation.tsv https://storage.googleapis.com/gresearch/kelm-corpus/updated-2021/quadruples-test.tsv Each file contains one example per line. Each example is a json object with three fields: triples: A list of triples of the form (subject, relation, object). eg. (Person X, award received, Award Y). If the triple has a subproperty, then it is quadruple instead. eg. (Person X, Award Y, received on, Date Z). serialized triples: triples concatenated together as used for input to T5. The format is "<subject> <relation> <object>" where some subjects have multiple relations, e.g. "<subject> <relation1> <object1> <relation2> <object2> <relation3> <object3>". For more details on how these relations are grouped, please refer to the paper. sentence: The wikipedia sentence aligned to these triples. The names, aliases and Wikidata Ids of the entities can be found in https://storage.googleapis.com/gresearch/kelm-corpus/updated-2021/entities.jsonl.

NewSHead

The NewSHead dataset contains 369,940 English stories with 932,571 unique URLs, among which there are 359,940 stories for training, 5,000 for validation, and 5,000 for testing, respectively. Each news story contains at least three (and up to five) articles. The dataset is collected from news stories published between May 2018 and May 2019, where a proprietary clustering algorithm iteratively loads articles published in a time window and groups them based on content similarity. Up to five representative articles are picked from the cluster for generating the story headline. Curators from a crowd-sourcing platform are requested to provide a headline of up to 35 characters to describe the major information covered by the story. Source: NewSHead

GDA

The gene-disease associations corpus contains 30,192 titles and abstracts from PubMed articles that have been automatically labelled for genes, diseases and gene-disease associations via distant supervision. The test set is comprised of 1000 of these examples. It is common to hold out a random 20% of the examples in the train set as a validation set.

2012 i2b2 Temporal Relations

The Sixth Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Natural Language Processing Challenge for Clinical Records focused on the temporal relations in clinical narratives. The organizers provided the research community with a corpus of discharge summaries annotated with temporal information, to be used for the development and evaluation of temporal reasoning systems. 18 teams from around the world participated in the challenge. During the workshop, participating teams presented comprehensive reviews and analysis of their systems, and outlined future research directions suggested by the challenge contributions.

TimeBank

Enriches the TimeML annotations of TimeBank by adding information about the Topic Time in terms of Klein (1994). The annotations are partly automatic, partly inferential and partly manual. The corpus was converted into the native format of the annotation software GraphAnno and POS-tagged using the Stanford bidirectional dependency network tagger. Source: Enriching TimeBank: Towards a more precise annotation of temporal relations in a text

DaNE

Danish Dependency Treebank (DaNE) is a named entity annotation for the Danish Universal Dependencies treebank using the CoNLL-2003 annotation scheme. Source: DaNE: A Named Entity Resource for Danish

출처: Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0. 아카이브 자료와 새로 수집한 논문은 별도로 관리합니다.