원문 초록
Answer accuracy alone does not distinguish failures in acoustic perception, rule knowledge, and rule application. AuDiR (Audio Diagnostic Reasoning) examines these distinctions through controlled input interventions. Each item contains an audio clip, a multiple-choice question, a task-general rule, and a textual description of the acoustic observations needed to answer. Three conditions progressively supply the rule and observations; a fourth removes the audio while retaining the question and rule. The first correct diagnostic condition assigns an operational response label, without identifying a unique internal cause. The current benchmark contains 201 items in 18 families drawn from 9 sources, with answer references documented separately from percept extraction. In a preliminary evaluation of Gemini-3.8-flash, accuracy is 29.3% without supplied information, 31.3% with the rule, and 98.5% with the observations also supplied. No-audio accuracy is 23.9%, with a confidence interval containing the 25.0% chance rate. A family-level knowledge probe associates incomplete rule recall with larger gains from rule provision. These results show the benefit of supplying acoustic observations as text, while incomplete validation, possible recognition shortcuts, and non-monotonic responses limit stronger failure-attribution claims.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.12478v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.