arXiv:2611.12222v1 cs.AI

PARIS: A multi-agent LLM framework for end-to-end, PRISMA-guided systematic literature reviews with pre-synthesis corpus quality assessment

Christophe Cruz (ICB, UBE), Hussam Ghanem (ICB, UBE), Samir Jabbar (ICB, UBE), Ait Kbir (ICB, UBE), Hocine Cherifi (ICB, UBE)

제출 2026-11-10

원문 초록

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) remain slow and labor-intensive, and most automation tools address single stages of the workflow. We present PARIS (PRISMA Agentic Research Intelligence System), an open-source framework in which a conductor agent running in Claude Code orchestrates 15 specialized large language model (LLM) agents, from scoping a research question to exporting a manuscript draft. Agents are specified declaratively, coordinate exclusively through persisted artifacts that the conductor validates before every transition, and delegate retrieval, bibliometric analysis and scoring to deterministic Python utilities. Three human checkpoints gate study inclusion, corpus adequacy and the synthesis outline. We also introduce QualityScore, a pre-synthesis index that aggregates normalized network, bibliometric, semantic and process sub-scores into a 0-100 grade. Two case studies illustrate both: AI chatbots and university students' learning (388 records, 100 included) and AI-assisted SR methods (131 records, 123 included, QualityScore 69.1 recomputed with a proxy network sub-score). They show end-to-end feasibility across domains and the diagnostic use of QualityScore: in the first run, corpus improvements chosen at the corpus-adequacy checkpoint raised the score from 74.6 to 81.9 and the number of pre-2023 studies from 1 to 19. Audits of both runs exposed failure modes: incomplete retrieval, counts that drifted between agents, unrecorded or delegated checkpoint decisions and a grade that depends on how citation data are handled. PARIS fully supports 8 of the 27 PRISMA 2020 items and partially supports 11. Output quality has so far been judged only by an internal reviewer agent; independent validation against human reviews is the next step.

제출 이력

확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.

  1. arXiv:2611.12222v1제출 시각 미확인

함께 살펴볼 논문

공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.

공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.

토론

이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.