원문 초록
The phrase recursive self-improvement (RSI) refers to the idea of an AI system designing and creating another, better AI system, which in turn designs and creates an even better one, and so on. While the idea has a long history, it has always been an abstract, futuristic idea -- until recently. Today's frontier AI has attained a set of abilities, including in programming, mathematics, research, tool use, and working coherently over extended periods of time, that make RSI seem plausible. AI companies are starting to pursue it, but many of the involved people are also expressing concerns, asking whether humanity should really set this in motion and under what conditions. I will discuss the situation, argue that we do not even have clear frameworks for thinking about the likely outcomes of RSI, and do a quick game-theoretic analysis of how to choose whether to initiate RSI when another party is making the same choice.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.10261v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.