Long-Form Information Alignment Evaluation Beyond Atomic Facts
원문 초록
Information alignment evaluators are vital for various NLG evaluation tasks and trustworthy LLM deployment, reducing hallucinations and enhancing user trust. Current fine-grained methods, like FactScore, verify facts individually but neglect inter-fact dependencies, enabling subtle vulnerabilities. In this work, we introduce MontageLie, a challenging benchmark that constructs deceptive narratives by "montaging" truthful statements without introducing explicit hallucinations. We demonstrate that both coarse-grained LLM-based evaluators and current fine-grained frameworks are susceptible to this attack, with AUC-ROC scores falling below 65%. To enable more robust fine-grained evaluation, we propose DoveScore, a novel framework that jointly verifies factual accuracy and event-order consistency. By modeling inter-fact relationships, DoveScore outperforms existing fine-grained methods by over 8%, providing a more robust solution for long-form text alignment evaluation. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/dannalily/DoveScore.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Writing-RL: Advancing Long-form Writing via Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning
SuperWriter: Reflection-Driven Long-Form Generation with Large Language Models
How Does Response Length Affect Long-Form Factuality
MedScore: Factuality Evaluation of Free-Form Medical Answers
Frankentext: Stitching random text fragments into long-form narratives
Teaching Large Language Models to Maintain Contextual Faithfulness via Synthetic Tasks and Reinforcement Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.