How Does Response Length Affect Long-Form Factuality
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for long-form text generation. However, factual errors in the responses would undermine their reliability. Despite growing attention to LLM factuality, the effect of response length on factuality remains underexplored. In this work, we systematically investigate this relationship by first introducing an automatic and bi-level long-form factuality evaluation framework, which achieves high agreement with human annotations while being cost-effective. Using this framework, we conduct controlled experiments and find that longer responses exhibit lower factual precision, confirming the presence of length bias. To explain this phenomenon, we empirically examine three hypotheses: error propagation, long context, and facts exhaustion. Our results reveal that facts exhaustion, where the model gradually exhausts more reliable knowledge, is the primary cause of factual degradation, rather than the other two hypotheses.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SuperWriter: Reflection-Driven Long-Form Generation with Large Language Models
ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.