Should I Trust You? Detecting Deception in Negotiations using Counterfactual RL
원문 초록
An increasingly prevalent socio-technical problem is people being taken in by offers that sound ``too good to be true'', where persuasion and trust shape decision-making. This paper investigates how \abr{ai} can help detect these deceptive scenarios. We analyze how humans strategically deceive each other in \textit{Diplomacy}, a board game that requires both natural language communication and strategic reasoning. This requires extracting logical forms of proposed agreements in player communications and computing the relative rewards of the proposal using agents' value functions. Combined with text-based features, this can improve our deception detection. Our method detects human deception with a high precision when compared to a Large Language Model approach that flags many true messages as deceptive. Future human-\abr{ai} interaction tools can build on our methods for deception detection by triggering \textit{friction} to give users a chance of interrogating suspicious proposals.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Inaugural MOASEI Competition at AAMAS'2025: A Technical Report
Case-based Reasoning Augmented Large Language Model Framework for Decision Making in Realistic Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
Make Your AUV Adaptive: An Environment-Aware Reinforcement Learning Framework For Underwater Tasks
Hypothesis Testing for Quantifying LLM-Human Misalignment in Multiple Choice Settings
CFBenchmark-MM: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model
HOP+: History-enhanced and Order-aware Pre-training for Vision-and-Language Navigation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.