Assessing Open-Source Large Language Models on Argumentation Mining Subtasks
원문 초록
We explore the capability of four open-sourcelarge language models (LLMs) in argumentation mining (AM). We conduct experiments on three different corpora; persuasive essays(PE), argumentative microtexts (AMT) Part 1 and Part 2, based on two argumentation mining sub-tasks: (i) argumentative discourse units classifications (ADUC), and (ii) argumentative relation classification (ARC). This work aims to assess the argumentation capability of open-source LLMs, including Mistral 7B, Mixtral8x7B, LlamA2 7B and LlamA3 8B in both, zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. Our analysis contributes to further assessing computational argumentation with open-source LLMs in future research efforts.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Tile-Based ViT Inference with Visual-Cluster Priors for Zero-Shot Multi-Species Plant Identification
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Detecting Subjectivity via Transfer-Learning and Corrective Data Augmentation
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Ensemble Methods for Detection of Scientific Discourse on Social Media
Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification
Con Instruction: Universal Jailbreaking of Multimodal Large Language Models via Non-Textual Modalities
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.