DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
원문 초록
Numerical claims, statements involving quantities, comparisons, and temporal references, pose unique challenges for automated fact-checking systems. In this study, we evaluate modeling strategies for veracity prediction of such claims using the QuanTemp dataset and building our own evidence retrieval pipeline. We investigate three key factors: (1) the impact of more evidences with longer input context windows using ModernBERT, (2) the effect of right-to-left (R2L) tokenization, and (3) their combined influence on classification performance. Contrary to prior findings in arithmetic reasoning tasks, R2L tokenization does not boost natural language inference (NLI) of numerical tasks. A longer context window does also not enhance veracity performance either, highlighting evidence quality as the dominant bottleneck. Our best-performing system achieves competitive macro-average F1 score of 0.57 and places us among the Top-4 submissions in Task 3 of CheckThat! 2025. Our code is available at https://github.com/dsgt-arc/checkthat-2025-numerical.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
SemViQA: A Semantic Question Answering System for Vietnamese Information Fact-Checking
Step-by-Step Fact Verification System for Medical Claims with Explainable Reasoning
FlashCheck: Exploration of Efficient Evidence Retrieval for Fast Fact-Checking
Self-Rationalization in the Wild: A Large Scale Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on NLI-related tasks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.