Decomposition Dilemmas: Does Claim Decomposition Boost or Burden Fact-Checking Performance?
원문 초록
Fact-checking pipelines increasingly adopt the Decompose-Then-Verify paradigm, where texts are broken down into smaller claims for individual verification and subsequently combined for a veracity decision. While decomposition is widely-adopted in such pipelines, its effects on final fact-checking performance remain underexplored. Some studies have reported improvements from decompostition, while others have observed performance declines, indicating its inconsistent impact. To date, no comprehensive analysis has been conducted to understand this variability. To address this gap, we present an in-depth analysis that explicitly examines the impact of decomposition on downstream verification performance. Through error case inspection and experiments, we introduce a categorization of decomposition errors and reveal a trade-off between accuracy gains and the noise introduced through decomposition. Our analysis provides new insights into understanding current system's instability and offers guidance for future studies toward improving claim decomposition in fact-checking pipelines.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.