Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones, but their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. Our study addresses the critical gap in evaluating LLM physical safety by developing a comprehensive benchmark for drone control. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations. Our evaluation of mainstream LLMs reveals an undesirable trade-off between utility and safety, with models that excel in code generation often performing poorly in crucial safety aspects. Furthermore, while incorporating advanced prompt engineering techniques such as In-Context Learning and Chain-of-Thought can improve safety, these methods still struggle to identify unintentional attacks. In addition, larger models demonstrate better safety capabilities, particularly in refusing dangerous commands. Our findings and benchmark can facilitate the design and evaluation of physical safety for LLMs. The project page is available at huggingface.co/spaces/TrustSafeAI/LLM-physical-safety.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
PRO-V: An Efficient Program Generation Multi-Agent System for Automatic RTL Verification
SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models
Technical Report for Argoverse2 Scenario Mining Challenges on Iterative Error Correction and Spatially-Aware Prompting
Exploring the Capabilities of the Frontier Large Language Models for Nuclear Energy Research
Does Prompt Design Impact Quality of Data Imputation by LLMs?
A Reward-driven Automated Webshell Malicious-code Generator for Red-teaming
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.