TabVer: Tabular Fact Verification with Natural Logic
원문 초록
Fact verification on tabular evidence incentivises the use of symbolic reasoning models where a logical form is constructed (e.g. a LISP-style program), providing greater verifiability than fully neural approaches. However, these systems typically rely on well-formed tables, restricting their use in many scenarios. An emerging symbolic reasoning paradigm for textual evidence focuses on natural logic inference, which constructs proofs by modelling set-theoretic relations between a claim and its evidence in natural language. This approach provides flexibility and transparency but is less compatible with tabular evidence since the relations do not extend to arithmetic functions. We propose a set-theoretic interpretation of numerals and arithmetic functions in the context of natural logic, enabling the integration of arithmetic expressions in deterministic proofs. We leverage large language models to generate arithmetic expressions by generating questions about salient parts of a claim which are answered by executing appropriate functions on tables. In a few-shot setting on FEVEROUS, we achieve an accuracy of 71.4, outperforming both fully neural and symbolic reasoning models by 3.4 points. When evaluated on TabFact without any further training, our method remains competitive with an accuracy lead of 0.5 points.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
Reasoning-Table: Exploring Reinforcement Learning for Table Reasoning
Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning
SemViQA: A Semantic Question Answering System for Vietnamese Information Fact-Checking
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.