CLEME2.0: Towards More Interpretable Evaluation by Disentangling Edits for Grammatical Error Correction
원문 초록
The paper focuses on improving the interpretability of Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) metrics, which receives little attention in previous studies. To bridge the gap, we propose CLEME2.0, a reference-based evaluation strategy that can describe four elementary dimensions of GEC systems, namely hit-correction, error-correction, under-correction, and over-correction. They collectively contribute to revealing the critical characteristics and locating drawbacks of GEC systems. Evaluating systems by Combining these dimensions leads to high human consistency over other reference-based and reference-less metrics. Extensive experiments on 2 human judgement datasets and 6 reference datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method. All the codes will be released after the peer review.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation
Exploring the Feasibility of Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction with a Single LLM up to 9B parameters: A Comparative Study of 17 Models
Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?
Explanation based In-Context Demonstrations Retrieval for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction
DSGram: Dynamic Weighting Sub-Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction in the Era of Large Language Models
Improving Explainability of Sentence-level Metrics via Edit-level Attribution for Grammatical Error Correction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.