Improving Explainability of Sentence-level Metrics via Edit-level Attribution for Grammatical Error Correction
원문 초록
Various evaluation metrics have been proposed for Grammatical Error Correction (GEC), but many, particularly reference-free metrics, lack explainability. This lack of explainability hinders researchers from analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of GEC models and limits the ability to provide detailed feedback for users. To address this issue, we propose attributing sentence-level scores to individual edits, providing insight into how specific corrections contribute to the overall performance. For the attribution method, we use Shapley values, from cooperative game theory, to compute the contribution of each edit. Experiments with existing sentence-level metrics demonstrate high consistency across different edit granularities and show approximately 70\% alignment with human evaluations. In addition, we analyze biases in the metrics based on the attribution results, revealing trends such as the tendency to ignore orthographic edits. Our implementation is available at \url{https://github.com/naist-nlp/gec-attribute}.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimator
Think Before You Attribute: Improving the Performance of LLMs Attribution Systems
Beyond the Attention: Distinguish the Discriminative and Confusable Features For Fine-grained Image Classification
Sentinel: Decoding Context Utilization via Attention Probing for Efficient LLM Context Compression
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
Attributes Shape the Embedding Space of Face Recognition Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.