Revisiting Counterfactual Regression through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Information Bottleneck
원문 초록
As a promising individualized treatment effect (ITE) estimation method, counterfactual regression (CFR) maps individuals' covariates to a latent space and predicts their counterfactual outcomes. However, the selection bias between control and treatment groups often imbalances the two groups' latent distributions and negatively impacts this method's performance. In this study, we revisit counterfactual regression through the lens of information bottleneck and propose a novel learning paradigm called Gromov-Wasserstein information bottleneck (GWIB). In this paradigm, we learn CFR by maximizing the mutual information between covariates' latent representations and outcomes while penalizing the kernelized mutual information between the latent representations and the covariates. We demonstrate that the upper bound of the penalty term can be implemented as a new regularizer consisting of $i)$ the fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations of different groups and $ii)$ the gap between the transport cost generated by the model and the cross-group Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations and the covariates. GWIB effectively learns the CFR model through alternating optimization, suppressing selection bias while avoiding trivial latent distributions. Experiments on ITE estimation tasks show that GWIB consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CFR methods. To promote the research community, we release our project at https://github.com/peteryang1031/Causal-GWIB.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence
Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Transformer-Based Spatial-Temporal Counterfactual Outcomes Estimation
Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.