Tell Me Why: Explainable Public Health Fact-Checking with Large Language Models
원문 초록
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of explainable fact-checking through a series of experiments, focusing on the ability of large language models to verify public health claims and provide explanations or justifications for their veracity assessments. We examine the effectiveness of zero/few-shot prompting and parameter-efficient fine-tuning across various open and closed-source models, examining their performance in both isolated and joint tasks of veracity prediction and explanation generation. Importantly, we employ a dual evaluation approach comprising previously established automatic metrics and a novel set of criteria through human evaluation. Our automatic evaluation indicates that, within the zero-shot scenario, GPT-4 emerges as the standout performer, but in few-shot and parameter-efficient fine-tuning contexts, open-source models demonstrate their capacity to not only bridge the performance gap but, in some instances, surpass GPT-4. Human evaluation reveals yet more nuance as well as indicating potential problems with the gold explanations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
LoSiA: Efficient High-Rank Fine-Tuning via Subnet Localization and Optimization
Detecting Referring Expressions in Visually Grounded Dialogue with Autoregressive Language Models
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
GuiLoMo: Allocating Expert Number and Rank for LoRA-MoE via Bilevel Optimization with GuidedSelection Vectors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.