Towards a Framework for Evaluating Explanations in Automated Fact Verification
원문 초록
As deep neural models in NLP become more complex, and as a consequence opaque, the necessity to interpret them becomes greater. A burgeoning interest has emerged in rationalizing explanations to provide short and coherent justifications for predictions. In this position paper, we advocate for a formal framework for key concepts and properties about rationalizing explanations to support their evaluation systematically. We also outline one such formal framework, tailored to rationalizing explanations of increasingly complex structures, from free-form explanations to deductive explanations, to argumentative explanations (with the richest structure). Focusing on the automated fact verification task, we provide illustrations of the use and usefulness of our formalization for evaluating explanations, tailored to their varying structures.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
JoFormer (Journey-based Transformer): Theory and Empirical Analysis on the Tiny Shakespeare Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.