Strong hallucinations from negation and how to fix them
원문 초록
Despite great performance on many tasks, language models (LMs) still struggle with reasoning, sometimes providing responses that cannot possibly be true because they stem from logical incoherence. We call such responses \textit{strong hallucinations} and prove that they follow from an LM's computation of its internal representations for logical operators and outputs from those representations. Focusing on negation, we provide a novel solution in which negation is treated not as another element of a latent representation, but as \textit{an operation over an LM's latent representations that constrains how they may evolve}. We show that our approach improves model performance in cloze prompting and natural language inference tasks with negation without requiring training on sparse negative data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding
Negation: A Pink Elephant in the Large Language Models' Room?
Multi-head attention debiasing and contrastive learning for mitigating Dataset Artifacts in Natural Language Inference
Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understanding
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Theorem-of-Thought: A Multi-Agent Framework for Abductive, Deductive, and Inductive Reasoning in Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.