How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation
원문 초록
Automated fact-checking is a crucial task in the governance of internet content. Although various studies utilize advanced models to tackle this issue, a significant gap persists in addressing complex real-world rumors and deceptive claims. To address this challenge, this paper explores the novel task of flaw-oriented fact-checking, including aspect generation and flaw identification. We also introduce RefuteClaim, a new framework designed specifically for this task. Given the absence of an existing dataset, we present FlawCheck, a dataset created by extracting and transforming insights from expert reviews into relevant aspects and identified flaws. The experimental results underscore the efficacy of RefuteClaim, particularly in classifying and elucidating false claims.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.