Can Strategic Data Collection Improve the Performance of Poverty Prediction Models?
원문 초록
Machine learning-based estimates of poverty and wealth are increasingly being used to guide the targeting of humanitarian aid and the allocation of social assistance. However, the ground truth labels used to train these models are typically borrowed from existing surveys that were designed to produce national statistics -- not to train machine learning models. Here, we test whether adaptive sampling strategies for ground truth data collection can improve the performance of poverty prediction models. Through simulations, we compare the status quo sampling strategies (uniform at random and stratified random sampling) to alternatives that prioritize acquiring training data based on model uncertainty or model performance on sub-populations. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that none of these active learning methods improve over uniform-at-random sampling. We discuss how these results can help shape future efforts to refine machine learning-based estimates of poverty.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Near-Polynomially Competitive Active Logistic Regression
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
Differential Attention for Multimodal Crisis Event Analysis
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning
Info-Coevolution: An Efficient Framework for Data Model Coevolution
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.