Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?
원문 초록
The charge prediction task aims to predict the charge for a case given its fact description. Recent models have already achieved impressive accuracy in this task, however, little is understood about the mechanisms they use to perform the judgment.For practical applications, a charge prediction model should conform to the certain legal theory in civil law countries, as under the framework of civil law, all cases are judged according to certain local legal theories. In China, for example, nearly all criminal judges make decisions based on the Four Elements Theory (FET).In this paper, we argue that trustworthy charge prediction models should take legal theories into consideration, and standing on prior studies in model interpretation, we propose three principles for trustworthy models should follow in this task, which are sensitive, selective, and presumption of innocence.We further design a new framework to evaluate whether existing charge prediction models learn legal theories. Our findings indicate that, while existing charge prediction models meet the selective principle on a benchmark dataset, most of them are still not sensitive enough and do not satisfy the presumption of innocence. Our code and dataset are released at https://github.com/ZhenweiAn/EXP_LJP.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Conformation-Aware Structure Prediction of Antigen-Recognizing Immune Proteins
Cautious Next Token Prediction
Where, What, Why: Towards Explainable Driver Attention Prediction
Out-of-Distribution Semantic Occupancy Prediction
Demystifying Distributed Training of Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction
Reconsidering Explicit Longitudinal Mammography Alignment for Enhanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.