Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners
원문 초록
Recent literature has shown that large language models (LLMs) are generally excellent few-shot reasoners to solve text reasoning tasks. However, the capability of LLMs on table reasoning tasks is yet to be explored. In this paper, we aim at understanding how well LLMs can perform table-related tasks with few-shot in-context learning. Specifically, we evaluated LLMs on popular table QA and fact verification datasets like WikiTableQuestion, FetaQA, TabFact, and FEVEROUS and found that LLMs are competent at complex reasoning over table structures, though these models are not pre-trained on any table corpus. When combined with `chain of thoughts' prompting, LLMs can achieve very strong performance with only a 1-shot demonstration, even on par with some SoTA models. We show that LLMs are even more competent at generating comprehensive long-form answers on FetaQA than tuned T5-large. We further manually studied the reasoning chains elicited from LLMs and found that these reasoning chains are highly consistent with the underlying semantic form. We believe that LLMs can serve as a simple yet generic baseline for future research. The code and data are released in https://github.com/wenhuchen/TableCoT.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Universal pre-training by iterated random computation
Evolving Prompts In-Context: An Open-ended, Self-replicating Perspective
Conquering the Retina: Bringing Visual in-Context Learning to OCT
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.