Twin Papers: A Simple Framework of Causal Inference for Citations via Coupling
원문 초록
The research process includes many decisions, e.g., how to entitle and where to publish the paper. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for investigating the effects of such decisions. The main difficulty in investigating the effects is that we need to know counterfactual results, which are not available in reality. The key insight of our framework is inspired by the existing counterfactual analysis using twins, where the researchers regard twins as counterfactual units. The proposed framework regards a pair of papers that cite each other as twins. Such papers tend to be parallel works, on similar topics, and in similar communities. We investigate twin papers that adopted different decisions, observe the progress of the research impact brought by these studies, and estimate the effect of decisions by the difference in the impacts of these studies. We release our code and data, which we believe are highly beneficial owing to the scarcity of the dataset on counterfactual studies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
Causal Cartographer: From Mapping to Reasoning Over Counterfactual Worlds
DeCaFlow: A Deconfounding Causal Generative Model
Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects
A Synthetic Business Cycle Approach to Counterfactual Analysis with Nonstationary Macroeconomic Data
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.