RuArg-2022: Argument Mining Evaluation
원문 초록
Argumentation analysis is a field of computational linguistics that studies methods for extracting arguments from texts and the relationships between them, as well as building argumentation structure of texts. This paper is a report of the organizers on the first competition of argumentation analysis systems dealing with Russian language texts within the framework of the Dialogue conference. During the competition, the participants were offered two tasks: stance detection and argument classification. A corpus containing 9,550 sentences (comments on social media posts) on three topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic (vaccination, quarantine, and wearing masks) was prepared, annotated, and used for training and testing. The system that won the first place in both tasks used the NLI (Natural Language Inference) variant of the BERT architecture, automatic translation into English to apply a specialized BERT model, retrained on Twitter posts discussing COVID-19, as well as additional masking of target entities. This system showed the following results: for the stance detection task an F1-score of 0.6968, for the argument classification task an F1-score of 0.7404. We hope that the prepared dataset and baselines will help to foster further research on argument mining for the Russian language.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Investigating the Robustness of Modelling Decisions for Few-Shot Cross-Topic Stance Detection: A Preregistered Study
Understanding and Tackling Label Errors in Individual-Level Nature Language Understanding
Leveraging Context for Multimodal Fallacy Classification in Political Debates
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Theorem-of-Thought: A Multi-Agent Framework for Abductive, Deductive, and Inductive Reasoning in Language Models
A MISMATCHED Benchmark for Scientific Natural Language Inference
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.