The Effects of Interactive AI Design on User Behavior: An Eye-tracking Study of Fact-checking COVID-19 Claims
원문 초록
We conducted a lab-based eye-tracking study to investigate how the interactivity of an AI-powered fact-checking system affects user interactions, such as dwell time, attention, and mental resources involved in using the system. A within-subject experiment was conducted, where participants used an interactive and a non-interactive version of a mock AI fact-checking system and rated their perceived correctness of COVID-19 related claims. We collected web-page interactions, eye-tracking data, and mental workload using NASA-TLX. We found that the presence of the affordance of interactively manipulating the AI system's prediction parameters affected users' dwell times, and eye-fixations on AOIs, but not mental workload. In the interactive system, participants spent the most time evaluating claims' correctness, followed by reading news. This promising result shows a positive role of interactivity in a mixed-initiative AI-powered system.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.