Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims
원문 초록
Fact-checking is the task of verifying the veracity of claims by assessing their assertions against credible evidence. The vast majority of fact-checking studies focus exclusively on political claims. Very little research explores fact-checking for other topics, specifically subject matters for which expertise is required. We present the first study of explainable fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise. For our case study we choose the setting of public health. To support this case study we construct a new dataset PUBHEALTH of 11.8K claims accompanied by journalist crafted, gold standard explanations (i.e., judgments) to support the fact-check labels for claims. We explore two tasks: veracity prediction and explanation generation. We also define and evaluate, with humans and computationally, three coherence properties of explanation quality. Our results indicate that, by training on in-domain data, gains can be made in explainable, automated fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
Self-Rationalization in the Wild: A Large Scale Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on NLI-related tasks
Take It Easy: Label-Adaptive Self-Rationalization for Fact Verification and Explanation Generation
Evaluating Evidence Attribution in Generated Fact Checking Explanations
Tell Me Why: Explainable Public Health Fact-Checking with Large Language Models
RU22Fact: Optimizing Evidence for Multilingual Explainable Fact-Checking on Russia-Ukraine Conflict
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.