Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment
원문 초록
Despite significant progress in text generation models, a serious limitation is their tendency to produce text that is factually inconsistent with information in the input. Recent work has studied whether textual entailment systems can be used to identify factual errors; however, these sentence-level entailment models are trained to solve a different problem than generation filtering and they do not localize which part of a generation is non-factual. In this paper, we propose a new formulation of entailment that decomposes it at the level of dependency arcs. Rather than focusing on aggregate decisions, we instead ask whether the semantic relationship manifested by individual dependency arcs in the generated output is supported by the input. Human judgments on this task are difficult to obtain; we therefore propose a method to automatically create data based on existing entailment or paraphrase corpora. Experiments show that our dependency arc entailment model trained on this data can identify factual inconsistencies in paraphrasing and summarization better than sentence-level methods or those based on question generation, while additionally localizing the erroneous parts of the generation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
A MISMATCHED Benchmark for Scientific Natural Language Inference
Bench4KE: Benchmarking Automated Competency Question Generation
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Multi-Hop Question Generation via Dual-Perspective Keyword Guidance
KG-QAGen: A Knowledge-Graph-Based Framework for Systematic Question Generation and Long-Context LLM Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.