Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction
원문 초록
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is the task of automatically predicting a law case's judgment results given a text describing its facts, which has excellent prospects in judicial assistance systems and convenient services for the public. In practice, confusing charges are frequent, because law cases applicable to similar law articles are easily misjudged. For addressing this issue, the existing method relies heavily on domain experts, which hinders its application in different law systems. In this paper, we present an end-to-end model, LADAN, to solve the task of LJP. To distinguish confusing charges, we propose a novel graph neural network to automatically learn subtle differences between confusing law articles and design a novel attention mechanism that fully exploits the learned differences to extract compelling discriminative features from fact descriptions attentively. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our LADAN.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AMBER: Adaptive Mesh Generation by Iterative Mesh Resolution Prediction
High Order Collaboration-Oriented Federated Graph Neural Network for Accurate QoS Prediction
KCLNet: Physics-Informed Power Flow Prediction via Constraints Projections
Metapath-guided Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Intent Recommendation
Long-Short Distance Graph Neural Networks and Improved Curriculum Learning for Emotion Recognition in Conversation
AI Wizards at CheckThat! 2025: Enhancing Transformer-Based Embeddings with Sentiment for Subjectivity Detection in News Articles
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.