Detecting Deception in Political Debates Using Acoustic and Textual Features
원문 초록
We present work on deception detection, where, given a spoken claim, we aim to predict its factuality. While previous work in the speech community has relied on recordings from staged setups where people were asked to tell the truth or to lie and their statements were recorded, here we use real-world political debates. Thanks to the efforts of fact-checking organizations, it is possible to obtain annotations for statements in the context of a political discourse as true, half-true, or false. Starting with such data from the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab, which was limited to text, we performed alignment to the corresponding videos, thus producing a multimodal dataset. We further developed a multimodal deep-learning architecture for the task of deception detection, which yielded sizable improvements over the state of the art for the CLEF-2018 Lab task 2. Our experiments show that the use of the acoustic signal consistently helped to improve the performance compared to using textual and metadata features only, based on several different evaluation measures. We release the new dataset to the research community, hoping to help advance the overall field of multimodal deception detection.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
How Entangled is Factuality and Deception in German?
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating Context and Tokenization Strategies for Numerical Fact Verification
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.