Facet-Aware Evaluation for Extractive Summarization
원문 초록
Commonly adopted metrics for extractive summarization focus on lexical overlap at the token level. In this paper, we present a facet-aware evaluation setup for better assessment of the information coverage in extracted summaries. Specifically, we treat each sentence in the reference summary as a \textit{facet}, identify the sentences in the document that express the semantics of each facet as \textit{support sentences} of the facet, and automatically evaluate extractive summarization methods by comparing the indices of extracted sentences and support sentences of all the facets in the reference summary. To facilitate this new evaluation setup, we construct an extractive version of the CNN/Daily Mail dataset and perform a thorough quantitative investigation, through which we demonstrate that facet-aware evaluation manifests better correlation with human judgment than ROUGE, enables fine-grained evaluation as well as comparative analysis, and reveals valuable insights of state-of-the-art summarization methods. Data can be found at https://github.com/morningmoni/FAR.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
OrderSum: Semantic Sentence Ordering for Extractive Summarization
StrucSum: Graph-Structured Reasoning for Long Document Extractive Summarization with LLMs
Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) for Research Documents in Sorani Kurdish
Advancements in Natural Language Processing for Automatic Text Summarization
Evaluating Extractive Summarization Techniques on News Articles
APE: Selective Fine-tuning with Acceptance Criteria for Language Model Adaptation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.