Evaluating Extractive Summarization Techniques on News Articles
원문 초록
In recent years, due to the rise of deep learning and natural language processing, text summarization has become a huge topic among scholars. Text summarization derives a shorter coherent version of a longer document. There are two methods of summarization namely, abstractive and extractive. This paper focuses on extractive summarization using TextRank and BERT. These algorithms have been tested under various circumstances to determine the best and they all perform better on certain parameters. The goal of this paper is to determine which algorithm performs better as compared to human generated extractive summaries on news dataset. The same dataset was used for both these algorithms and the summaries were evaluated using ROUGE Score. The result showed that TextRank yielded a better ROUGE score as compared to BERT. TextRank showed higher F-measure and recall while BERT had higher precision.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LimTopic: LLM-based Topic Modeling and Text Summarization for Analyzing Scientific Articles limitations
Comprehensive Manuscript Assessment with Text Summarization Using 69707 articles
Summarization Metrics for Spanish and Basque: Do Automatic Scores and LLM-Judges Correlate with Humans?
ARLED: Leveraging LED-based ARMAN Model for Abstractive Summarization of Persian Long Documents
Advancements in Natural Language Processing for Automatic Text Summarization
APE: Selective Fine-tuning with Acceptance Criteria for Language Model Adaptation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.