Counterfactual Fairness
원문 초록
Machine learning can impact people with legal or ethical consequences when it is used to automate decisions in areas such as insurance, lending, hiring, and predictive policing. In many of these scenarios, previous decisions have been made that are unfairly biased against certain subpopulations, for example those of a particular race, gender, or sexual orientation. Since this past data may be biased, machine learning predictors must account for this to avoid perpetuating or creating discriminatory practices. In this paper, we develop a framework for modeling fairness using tools from causal inference. Our definition of counterfactual fairness captures the intuition that a decision is fair towards an individual if it is the same in (a) the actual world and (b) a counterfactual world where the individual belonged to a different demographic group. We demonstrate our framework on a real-world problem of fair prediction of success in law school.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
Causal-Aware Intelligent QoE Optimization for VR Interaction with Adaptive Keyframe Extraction
Quantifying Fairness in LLMs Beyond Tokens: A Semantic and Statistical Perspective
Towards Fairness Assessment of Dutch Hate Speech Detection
Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.