Open Information Extraction (OIE) aims to extract factual relational tuples from open-domain sentences. Downstream tasks use the extracted OIE tuples as facts, without examining the certainty of these facts. However, uncertainty/speculation is a common linguistic phenomenon. Existing studies on speculation detection are defined at sentence level, but even if a sentence is determined to be speculative, not all tuples extracted from it may be speculative. In this paper, we propose to study speculations in OIE and aim to determine whether an extracted tuple is speculative. We formally define the research problem of tuple-level speculation detection and conduct a detailed data analysis on the LSOIE dataset which contains labels for speculative tuples. Lastly, we propose a baseline model OIE-Spec for this new research task.
Speculation is a naturally occurring phenomena in textual data, forming an integral component of many systems, especially in the biomedical information retrieval domain. Previous work addressing cue detection and scope resolution (the two subtasks of speculation detection) have ranged from rule-based systems to deep learning-based approaches. In this paper, we apply three popular transformer-based architectures, BERT, XLNet and RoBERTa to this task, on two publicly available datasets, BioScope Corpus and SFU Review Corpus, reporting substantial improvements over previously reported results (by at least 0.29 F1 points on cue detection and 4.27 F1 points on scope resolution). We also experiment with joint training of the model on multiple datasets, which outperforms the single dataset training approach by a good margin. We observe that XLNet consistently outperforms BERT and RoBERTa, contrary to results on other benchmark datasets. To confirm this observation, we apply XLNet and RoBERTa to negation detection and scope resolution, reporting state-of-the-art results on negation scope resolution for the BioScope Corpus (increase of 3.16 F1 points on the BioScope Full Papers, 0.06 F1 points on the BioScope Abstracts) and the SFU Review Corpus (increase of 0.3 F1 points).