Protecting sensitive program content is a critical issue in various situations, ranging from legitimate use cases to unethical contexts. Obfuscation is one of the most used techniques to ensure such protection. Consequently, attackers must first detect and characterize obfuscation before launching any attack against it. This paper investigates the problem of function-level obfuscation detection using graph-based approaches, comparing algorithms, from elementary baselines to promising techniques like GNN (Graph Neural Networks), on different feature choices. We consider various obfuscation types and obfuscators, resulting in two complex datasets. Our findings demonstrate that GNNs need meaningful features that capture aspects of function semantics to outperform baselines. Our approach shows satisfactory results, especially in a challenging 11-class classification task and in a practical malware analysis example.
To avoid detection, adversaries often use command-line obfuscation. There are numerous techniques of the command-line obfuscation, all designed to alter the command-line syntax without affecting its original functionality. This variability forces most security solutions to create an exhaustive enumeration of signatures for even a single pattern. In contrast to using signatures, we have implemented a scalable NLP-based detection method that leverages a custom-trained, small transformer language model that can be applied to any source of execution logs. The evaluation on top of real-world telemetry demonstrates that our approach yields high-precision detections even on high-volume telemetry from a diverse set of environments spanning from universities and businesses to healthcare or finance. The practical value is demonstrated in a case study of real-world samples detected by our model. We show the model's superiority to signatures on established malware known to employ obfuscation and showcase previously unseen obfuscated samples detected by our model.