← Robot Manipulation Generalization
Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0

GEMBench

아카이브 평가 6건 · 마지막 적재/변경

평가 기록

과거 수집 기록이며 최신 순위가 아닙니다. 데이터셋 버전·split·실험 조건과 지표 방향이 검증되지 않은 결과는 직접 비교할 수 없습니다. 날짜는 논문 날짜이며 최신 평가일을 뜻하지 않습니다.

표가 화면보다 넓으면 좌우로 스크롤하여 논문과 구현 링크를 확인하세요.

원본 기록 순서 · 순위 미부여
모델원본 지표·값논문구현
3D-LOTUS++
Average Success Rate (L1)
68.7±0.6
Average Success Rate (L2)
64.5±0.9
Average Success Rate (L3)
41.5±1.8
Average Success Rate (L4)
17.4±0.4
Average Success Rate
48.0
Towards Generalizable Vision-Language Robotic Manipulation: A Benchmark and LLM-guided 3D Policy
2024-10-02
코드 1
3D-LOTUS
Average Success Rate (L1)
94.3±1.4
Average Success Rate (L2)
49.9±2.2
Average Success Rate (L3)
38.1±1.1
Average Success Rate (L4)
0.3±0.3
Average Success Rate
45.7
Towards Generalizable Vision-Language Robotic Manipulation: A Benchmark and LLM-guided 3D Policy
2024-10-02
코드 1
3D diffuser actor
Average Success Rate (L1)
91.9±0.8
Average Success Rate (L2)
43.4±2.8
Average Success Rate (L3)
37.0±2.2
Average Success Rate (L4)
0.0±0.0
Average Success Rate
44.0
3D Diffuser Actor: Policy Diffusion with 3D Scene Representations
2024-02-18
코드 1
RVT-2
Average Success Rate (L1)
89.1±0.8
Average Success Rate (L2)
51.0±2.3
Average Success Rate (L3)
36.0±2.2
Average Success Rate (L4)
0.0±0.0
Average Success Rate
44.0
RVT-2: Learning Precise Manipulation from Few Demonstrations
2024-06-12
코드 1
PolarNet
Average Success Rate (L1)
77.7±0.9
Average Success Rate (L2)
37.1±1.4
Average Success Rate (L3)
38.5±1.7
Average Success Rate (L4)
0.1±0.2
Average Success Rate
38.4
PolarNet: 3D Point Clouds for Language-Guided Robotic Manipulation
2023-09-27
코드 1
Hiveformer
Average Success Rate (L1)
60.3±1.5
Average Success Rate (L2)
26.1±1.4
Average Success Rate (L3)
35.1±1.7
Average Success Rate (L4)
0.0±0.0
Average Success Rate
30.4
Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations
2022-09-11
코드 1 · 코드 2