arXiv:2611.15710v1 cs.LG

Curiosity-0826-4B: Generative Medical Event Sequence Modeling Across Pediatric and Adult Populations

Mani Nagarathnam, Luke Benham, Paul Blazek, John Cashy, Kevin Chung, John Muenning, Hank Voeller, Shane Waxler, Davis White, Alison Callahan, Kevin Dysart, Andrew Loza, Michal A. Mankowski, Mattheus Ramsis, Nigam H. Shah 외 2명

제출 2026-11-13

원문 초록

We introduce Curiosity-0826-4B, an updated version of the generative medical event foundation model trained on Epic Cosmos that simulates patient timelines to produce zero-shot clinical predictions. Curiosity-0826-4B incorporates a broader patient population and richer clinical event representations, while generally matching or exceeding Curiosity-0226-1B, the largest model in the previous Curiosity-0226 series, on evaluated tasks supported by both models. Laboratory value prediction improved, with MAE 18--46% lower than that of Curiosity-0226-1B. We evaluated prediction of disease events across pediatric cohorts aged 2--17 years. AUROCs for new asthma diagnosis (0.742--0.785) and asthma exacerbation (0.829--0.852) were comparable to those in the adult reference cohort, while AUROCs for sickle cell crisis (0.820--0.847) were lower than in adults (0.915). Explicit representation of documented death enabled new mortality prediction tasks among adults across hospice, inpatient, and ambulatory settings (AUROC 0.821--0.942). Scaling-law analysis guided compute-optimal initial pretraining followed by continued pretraining with context extension. The resulting Curiosity-0826-4B model has more parameters (4.3B versus 1B) and a longer context window (16K versus 8K). It processes 56% fewer training tokens and requires 2.2 times the training floating point operations (FLOPs) compared with its predecessor. By extending a common zero-shot prediction strategy to pediatric patients and additional outcomes, Curiosity-0826-4B broadens opportunities to develop clinical and operational applications without training separate task-specific models. Further validation should assess local calibration, performance across patient subgroups and event frequencies, timeline completion rates, and generalization to new settings, alongside prospective evaluation of clinical and operational utility.

제출 이력

확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.

  1. arXiv:2611.15710v1제출 시각 미확인

함께 살펴볼 논문

공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.

공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.

토론

이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.