Which Acoustic Features Survive Compression? Tracker-Estimated First-Formant Statistics for Codec-Robust Audio DeepfakeDetection
원문 초록
Audio deepfake detectors that work well on clean lab recordings often degrade after telephone or platform compression. This paper asks a specific question: which low-dimensional acoustic descriptors stay informative after codec degradation? We screen 36 utterance-level features(formants, PNCCs, LFCCs, prosody) on ASVspoof 2019 data and test on the official ASVspoof 2021 LA set across seven codec conditions. Of 33 statistically significant descriptors, only four show large practical separation (|r| >0.5, bootstrap 95% CIs), all first-formant (F1) measures, highly redundant (PC1: 79% variance). The payoff is stability: the 36-feature SVM degrades 14 pp under codec mismatch (9.5%-23.5% EER), while the four-feature RBF-SVM degrades only 5.9 pp (17.0%-22.9%). The F1 subset varies 3.4 pp across conditions versus 13.1 pp for the full set. F1 differences persist after controlling for speaker identity (p greater than 10^10, mixed-effects model). The results suggest that physically interpretable F1 statistics offer a compact, codec-stable diagnostic signal that may complement higher accuracy neural detectors.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.13258v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.