arXiv:2611.13191v1 cs.CV

Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Geographic Atrophy Segmentation in En Face OCT Images

Utkarsh Doshi, Adarsh Gadari, Sharat Chandra Vupparaboina, Joseph DeCicco, Giulia Gregori, Nicola Valsecchi, Nasiq Hasan, Elham Sadeghi, Jos\`e-Alain Sahel, Jay Chhablani, Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina, Sandeep Chandra Bollepalli

제출 2026-11-11

원문 초록

Background: Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It causes irreversible vision loss due to progressive degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors. Accurate segmentation of GA in en-face image is crucial for early diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and developing personalized treatment strategies. However, existing deep learning approaches are typically evaluated using single architectures and single-device datasets, limiting insight into relative performance and cross-device robustness. Methods: We trained and systematically compared five deep learning architectures for GA segmentation: Nested U-Net, ResU-Net, nnUnet, Swin-Unet and MedSegDiff model, together with a thresholding based classical baseline. The models were trained on a dataset of en-face OCT images derived from 269 OCT volumes from two different devices, following a three-step preprocessing technique involving normalization and inpainting to enhance the quality of the en-face images. Results: On the fixed held-out validation set comprising OCT scans from both Cirrus (R) (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., USA) and Spectralis (R) (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) devices, nnUnet achieved the highest mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.8882 +/- 0.0033. The other models yielded the following Dice scores: Nested U-Net (0.7932 +/- 0.0423), ResU-Net (0.8453 +/- 0.0074), Swin-Unet (0.6886 +/- 0.0294), and Diffusion model (0.7959 +/- 0.0242). Conclusions: nnUnet framework, demonstrated most reliable performance for GA segmentation in en-face OCT under limited data conditions. It offers the best balance of accuracy, stability, and efficiency for GA quantification.

제출 이력

확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.

  1. arXiv:2611.13191v1제출 시각 미확인

함께 살펴볼 논문

공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.

공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.

토론

이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.