Tropical Gaussian Anticoncentration: Optimal Instance-Dependent Bounds for Online Learning in Extensive-Form Games
원문 초록
We study the minimax regret of full-information online decision making in extensive-form games. For prediction with expert advice, the optimal regret is $\Theta(\sqrt{T\log K})$, where $K$ is the number of experts, or equivalently, the number of normal-form actions. For treeplex strategy spaces, existing efficient algorithms, including KOMWU and online mirror descent with the weight-one dilated entropy regularizer, achieve regret $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T\log|\mathcal{V}|})$, where $\mathcal{V}$ is the set of reduced normal-form strategies. We prove that this logarithmic dependence is minimax optimal in the worst-case full-information reward model. The main difficulty is that pure plans in a treeplex are not independent experts: their rewards are correlated through the recursive structure of decisions and observations. To capture this correlation, we introduce tropical Gaussian formulae, recursive Gaussian expressions built from maxima and normalized sums which preserve the variance. The index count of such a formula matches the number of reduced normal-form continuation plans in the corresponding subtree. Our main analytic result shows that every log-balanced tropical Gaussian formula with index count $N$ has Gaussian width $\Omega(\sqrt{\log N})$. While a direct approach struggles to recover this lower bound, our proof uses a spherical entropy profile to measure scale-dependent separation among the Gaussian directions, and then applies Tur\'an's theorem and Sudakov minoration to obtain the width lower bound. Applying this result to treeplexes gives an oblivious hard distribution with valid transition outcome and Rademacher terminal rewards, establishing a regret lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{T\log|\mathcal{V}|})$. This matches known upper bounds up to universal constants and shows that the DilEnt/KOMWU dependence on the reduced normal-form complexity is unavoidable.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.11877v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.