원문 초록
Compact object detectors such as YOLOv8n are a common choice for camera-based fire and smoke detection on low-power devices. These detectors are usually evaluated with box-level metrics such as mean average precision, and their outputs are turned into decisions with a fixed confidence threshold such as 0.25 or 0.5. A fire monitoring system, however, makes one decision per image: raise an alarm or not. In this paper we evaluate two publicly available compact detectors on the D-Fire test set at the image level. We compare three simple rules for turning box detections into one alarm score per image, and we use a split conformal procedure to choose the alarm threshold from held-out images so that the expected fraction of missed fire and smoke images stays below a chosen target. We find that the same fixed threshold leads to very different miss rates for the two detectors, 17.3 and 8.4 percent at a threshold of 0.5, while the calibrated threshold meets miss-rate targets of 10, 5 and 1 percent for both detectors and all three rules. At a 5 percent target, the false alarm rate on images without fire or smoke stays between 1.2 and 3.0 percent. We also find that smoke-only images stay below the target even when the overall target is met, and we describe the main failure cases.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.11757v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.