Correctness Metric Matters: NWD-Based Calibration Loss for Tiny Person Detection in UAV Infrared Imagery
원문 초록
Detection calibration aligns predicted confidence with empirical correctness. Existing calibration losses inherit their correctness definition from box regression, specifically IoU against a hard threshold. We show that this target is geometrically ill-posed for tiny objects in UAV infrared imagery, where persons occupy less than 0.1\% of the image. The same pixel error is penalized more heavily as the target shrinks, so binary prediction calibration (BPC) actively suppresses confidences that should be high. On HIT-UAV, BPC with an IoU target degrades image-level localization-aware ECE (LaECE) from 0.0689 to 0.0761, 0.0649 to 0.0733, and 0.0653 to 0.0682 across Low, Mid, and High signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR) groups. We replace the IoU target with a continuous, scale-invariant normalized Wasserstein distance (NWD). The NWD target reduces LaECE\(_{\mathrm{NWD}}\) relative to BPC+IoU on all three groups (\(p<10^{-7}\)) with mAP neutral (0.9356 vs.\ 0.9347), and an independent center-offset anchor confirms that the gain is a genuine geometric correction. The improvement holds across a broad plateau of calibration weights. The NWD formulation requires no inference-time mapping layer. If a validation-fitted isotonic map is applied on top of it, calibration is lowered further, and the two corrections act on different components of the same error. The metric-level remedy has a measurable boundary. Target-background thermal pairing in the training distribution and detection-level aggregation under per-image detection-count heterogeneity lie outside it. Both are quantified independently of the NWD target.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.11735v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.