원문 초록
Relevant evidence in Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) collections may be distributed across passages in different parts of a work, including verses, translations, and commentaries. Locating it requires matching natural-language questions and partially remembered verse fragments to source passages. We present Dhara, a retrieval engine combining hybrid search, chapter- and book-level Entity Notes (EN), Fuzzy Verse Retrieval (FVR), and neural reranking. Five comparisons on the 325 questions in Dhara Bench examine retrieval representations against BM25, EN's contribution, reranker quality and computation time, FVR, and Gemini. BGE-M3 single-vector retrieval exceeds BM25 in nDCG@10, Recall@20, and MRR@20 across all categories. Its scores are broadly comparable to ColBERTv2, with mean retrieval times of 0.108 s and 0.962 s under the same hardware configuration and a smaller memory footprint for chunk storage on disk. Adding EN to a direct branch with a matched candidate count improves nDCG@10 in all twelve categories with Qwen and ten with BGE; the combined ranking is capped at the same candidate count. Qwen improves nDCG@10, Precision@5, and MRR@20 over BGE in every category, at approximately 6.72 times the overall estimated serial computation time. FVR increases Verse-category nDCG@10 by approximately 20 percentage points with either reranker. Gemini is evaluated after source mapping and manual review with relevance annotations visible. The Qwen pipeline with EN and FVR has higher Recall@20 than Gemini in ten categories and stronger complete-evidence retrieval in Multi-hop questions, while Gemini retains early-relevance advantages in several categories. The results inform retrieval choices according to evidence requirements and resource budgets.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.11197v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.