원문 초록
Deployed ML models face non-stationary data and delayed labels, yet most retraining strategies rely on fixed schedules or brittle drift thresholds that ignore operational cost. In this setting, retraining is a sequential decision problem rather than a one-time threshold choice. We present DARE (Drift-Aware Retraining Engine), an offline, event-driven retraining framework that separates ingestion, monitoring, policy decisions, training, and logging through explicit schemas and deterministic replay. We compare DARE against practical heuristic retraining baselines, including fixed-interval, threshold-persistence, and action-rate-matched fixed scheduling policies. On Airline, the locked LinUCB policy achieves a higher mean F1 while substantially reducing intervention frequency relative to heuristic and action-rate-matched baselines. Additional runtime-calibrated evaluation shows that these gains persist when measured using the cumulative update wall-clock time. These results suggest that conservative sequential retraining policies can improve performance while reducing unnecessary operational overhead under delayed feedback.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.10313v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.